Search The Web

Friday, May 4, 2012

Better learn to smile, Bubby, before the Fed Happiness Police are unleashed

Be afraid. Be very afraid.
It's not like our Federal government doesn't have enough real problems to concern itself with, or enough time to come up with useful solutions, or enough resources to apply them. So why are pointy heads in the nation's capital--and, for all I know, sequestered in deep, hardened underground bunkers scattered throughout the fifty states and maybe some territories too--expending their considerable energies and intellects [yes, I know I'm making assumptions here] and lots of OUR MONEY on trying to define happiness ?

No, this is not a joke. Look, if you don't believe me, check out Peter Whoriskey's March 29 piece in The Washington Post, ' If you’re happy and you know it ... let the government know', excerpted liberally below.

* * *

Of all the phrases bestowed to us by the Founding Fathers, few come up more than “pursuit of happiness.” Yet who knows where the nation really stands on that score?

Now an answer may be forthcoming. Amid a wave of research on the subject, the federal government is seeking ways to measure what some have called gross national happiness.

Funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, a panel of experts in psychology and economics, including Nobel laureate Daniel Kahneman, began convening in December to try to define reliable measures of “subjective well-being.” If successful, these could become official statistics.But as the United States ventures into the squishy realm of feelings, statisticians will first have to define happiness and then how to measure it. Neither is a trivial matter. There is even some doubt whether people, when polled, can accurately say whether they are happy.

“I’m worried about the word ‘happiness’,” Kahneman, an author and psychologist, said during a break in a meeting last week.

Whatever the obstacles, the effort has momentum. President Obama has “welcomed” the effort, according to a White House release, and his chief economic adviser, Alan Krueger, is one of the leading researchers in the field.

Before being named chair of the Council of Economic Advisers, Krueger co-wrote one of the key papers on the topic. In it, Krueger and his co-authors proposed a method for generating a national statistic covering “the flow of emotional experience during daily activities.”

The panel, organized by the nonprofit National Academies, has already met with two of the key figures in the U.S. statistical bureaucracy:Robert Groves, the director of the U.S. Census Bureau, and Steve Landefeld, the director of the Bureau of Economic Analysis, the federal agency that puts out the gross domestic product figures.

According to proponents, a measure of happiness could help assess the success or failure of a range of government policies. It could gauge the virtues of a health benefit or establish whether education has more value than simply higher incomes. It might also detect extremes of inequality or imbalances in how people divide their time between work and leisure.

* * *

For additional perspectives on this quest, check out these worthy articles, spanning the journalistic spectrum from The Washington Post (again) to The Weekly Standard.

No comments:

Post a Comment